{"id":15506,"date":"2023-10-20T16:38:02","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T15:38:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.architecturemaker.com\/?p=15506"},"modified":"2023-10-20T16:38:02","modified_gmt":"2023-10-20T15:38:02","slug":"can-architecture-be-an-emancipatory-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.architecturemaker.com\/can-architecture-be-an-emancipatory-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Architecture Be An Emancipatory Project"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Architecture is often labelled as a mere craft, with its practitioners sometimes disregarding a much larger ethical and social impact the built environment holds and the communities it affects. While architecture is commonly linked to providing shelter, the field and its practices are much more than the functional capabilities of a building, which should be addressed to make our cities healthful and beautiful. Architecture fulfills its potential as an emancipatory project when it provides an avenue for participating individuals to be focused on social and environmental impact, amongst meeting the functional needs of the users.<\/p>\n

The idea of emancipation is not new. Being explored for the first time in the 18th century, the term has never been associated explicitly with architecture, although some theorists have used architecture as a tool to address discipline, power and social imagination. Drawing from both emancipatory philosophies and the elements of architecture, along with their production and use, an emancipatory practice in architecture can be articulated.<\/p>\n

The relationship between architecture and empowerment is complicated. It has been well documented that the built environment is a tool to maintain power, status and hierarchies. The relationship between architecture and power has been explored in depth by Siegfried Giedion, who noted that architecture is a “metaphor of history”. It is the product of decision-making and political will, and when these decisions are made consciously and based on social justice, emancipation is possible. Studies such as those by Dan Hill, who suggest that human emotion and experience play a central role in the way architecture shapes our society, also support emancipation in architecture. Dan Hill’s work suggests that architecture is a tool for socio-cultural change that can build passion, continuity, social harmony and liberation.<\/p>\n

Emancipatory architecture seeks to: create more participatory contexts to allow people to shape their built environment; promote social justice and diversity; promote equity and equal opportunity; and, take advantage of the opportunity to combine a range of people in a shared setting. It assumes that the design and development of the built environment has implications beyond physical form, but also in terms of its political, economic, and social impact. For example, those occupying spaces with emancipatory architecture are not isolated from the effects of their physical surroundings, nor are they excluded from any potential cultural benefits. Additionally, it requires a sense of public confidence and ownership in the project, with the architects and planners taking a proactive role in facilitating public participation. All in all, emancipatory architecture is about enabling individuals and communities to take control of their environment in order to create new possibilities and futures.<\/p>\n

Citizen Experiences<\/h2>\n