{"id":1970,"date":"2023-03-06T18:52:24","date_gmt":"2023-03-06T17:52:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.architecturemaker.com\/?p=1970"},"modified":"2023-03-06T18:52:24","modified_gmt":"2023-03-06T17:52:24","slug":"why-monolithic-architecture-is-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.architecturemaker.com\/why-monolithic-architecture-is-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"Why monolithic architecture is bad?"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are many reasons why monolithic architecture is bad. Perhaps the most obvious reason is that monolithic applications are very difficult to manage and scale. When an application is monolithic, all of the code is contained in a single codebase. This means that if you need to make a change to the application, you have to make the change to the entire codebase. This can be very time-consuming and difficult to do. Additionally, monolithic applications are often difficult to test and deploy. If one part of the application is not working, it can be difficult to determine where the problem is and how to fix it. Finally, monolithic applications can be very slow. Because all of the code is contained in a single codebase, it can take a long time for the application to start up and run.<\/p>\n

Monolithic architecture is a bad idea because it promotes tight coupling and doesn’t encourage modular design. This can make code difficult to maintain and extend, and can lead to problems down the line when you need to make changes to the system.<\/p>\n

What are the disadvantages of monolithic architecture? <\/h2>\n

There are several disadvantages to monolithic systems: <\/p>\n

-They lack the agility and flexibility that many modern businesses require
\n-Because all functions and services are locked into each other, it’s hard to optimize any one function without taking the entire application apart
\n-This makes them hard to scale<\/p>\n