What Is The Difference Between Revit And Revit Architecture

Revit and Revit Architecture are two very distinct yet similarly named programs. They were designed by Autodesk, a leader in professional design and engineering software, to help architects, engineers, and designers to create highly accurate 3D designs and visualizations of buildings and other structures. While they are both built on the Autodesk Revit platform, they are specialized for alternative uses and have some distinct differences.

The first major difference between Revit and Revit Architecture is the capabilities of each program. Revit is a general modeling software that provides detailed drawings and descriptions of structures, both on and off the ground. Revit Architecture is more specialized than Revit, as it focuses largely on the architecture of buildings, allowing architects to create detailed plans and models of the interior and exterior of their designs.

The other major difference between Revit and Revit Architecture is the types of tools available in each program. Revit offers a wide range of tools, including 3D modeling, rendering, and animation. Revit Architecture is more limited in its tools, and provides primarily drafting, modeling, and parameter-based design tools. That said, Revit Architecture does offer some unique capabilities, such as environmental analysis, energy modeling, and facility management.

Architects should also be aware of the differences in the level of detail between Revit and Revit Architecture. Revit allows for more complex and detailed models, while Revit Architecture focuses on the practical needs of design, rather than the aesthetic elements. That’s not to say Revit Architecture models are any less accurate than those created in Revit, they simply may not be as detailed. This is because Revit Architecture focuses primarily on the practical elements, rather than the aesthetic elements.

The cost of both programs is another point of difference. Revit is priced at a higher level than Revit Architecture, which is typically less expensive. This is because Revit costs more to install and maintain. Revit Architecture, on the other hand, is more affordable and requires less investment to purchase and use.

Finally, the learning curves for Revit and Revit Architecture are also quite different. Learning Revit requires a more in-depth understanding of the software, and can take more time to master. Revit Architecture, on the other hand, has a more shallow learning curve and is simpler to use. As a result, it can be a great starting point for those who are just beginning to explore the world of architectural design.

Skills Required

In terms of the skills required to use either Revit or Revit Architecture, they are both quite different. To use Revit, architects will need a strong understanding of the fundamentals of architecture, as well as a knowledge of 3D modeling, rendering, and animation. Revit Architecture, on the other hand, requires a focus on practical elements and coordinate systems, as well as a familiarity with drafting, modeling, and parameter-based design tools.

User Communities

The user communities for both Revit and Revit Architecture are robust and active. On Autodesk’s official forums, users can find advice and tutorials on how to use each program, as well as tips for troubleshooting any issues that may arise. Additionally, there are numerous online communities and resources that provide helpful information for both programs.


In terms of compatibility with other software programs, Revit and Revit Architecture are both quite compatible. Both programs are able to work with Autodesk’s suite of programs, as well as popular 3D modeling software such as 3ds Max and Maya. Additionally, both programs support a variety of file formats, including AutoCAD, IFC, and DWG.


Revit and Revit Architecture are both available as standalone programs, as well as an integrated part of the Autodesk Suite. They can be purchased from Autodesk’s official website, as well as from a number of other online retailers.

Anita Johnson is an award-winning author and editor with over 15 years of experience in the fields of architecture, design, and urbanism. She has contributed articles and reviews to a variety of print and online publications on topics related to culture, art, architecture, and design from the late 19th century to the present day. Johnson's deep interest in these topics has informed both her writing and curatorial practice as she seeks to connect readers to the built environment around them.

Leave a Comment