Which Of The Following Software Architecture Is Best Suited

Type Of Software Architecture

The software architecture of an application is often one of the most difficult design decisions an organization has to make. However, it is a necessary element that can provide a foundation for system scalability and maintainability. Understanding which of the most popular software architectures is best suited for a particular project is an important step in the software development process.

Layered Architecture

The layered architecture is considered the default architecture of many applications. Its most recognizable form consists of five tiers: presentation, business, database, services and infrastructure. The layers exist to provide a clear separation of responsibilities. The typically increase in granularity as they go from the presentation layer to the infrastructure layer: the presentation layer deals with user interfaces, business layer deals with logic, database layer deals with data persistence, services layer deals with particular functions, and the infrastructure layer deals with system-level services. This granular distribution of responsibility can result in an architecture that is both easy to maintain and extend.

Event Driven Architecture

The event-driven architecture (EDA) is a software architecture designed to handle large numbers of events that cause changes in various parts of the system. These events can be user-requested, system-triggered, or externally-generated. EDA is commonly used in distributed, service-oriented architectures. Its strength lies in the ability to react quickly to incoming events and process those events by using small chunks of code, called functions, which can easily be scaled and managed. EDA is often a better choice than traditional architectures when dealing with a variety of input events.

Message Queue/Broker Architecture

The message queue/broker architecture is a distributed software architecture that specializes in dispatching messages between applications in an asynchronous manner. It relies on a message broker, such as RabbitMQ, to store and route messages between different applications. This architecture is often seen in distributed systems, where multiple services need to communicate with each other, but would otherwise not be connected. The message queue/broker architecture is very efficient in terms of resource utilization, scalability and redundancy.

Microservices Architecture

The microservices architecture is a type of software architecture in which applications are built out of a multitude of small, independent services. The goal of this architecture is to decompose a large application into small, isolated services, each with their own set of capabilities. This modular approach allows for an application to be highly scalable, resilient, and maintainable. The main drawback to this type of architecture is that it can be difficult to coordinate between services, as no single service is responsible for the entire system.


When it comes to deciding which of the popular software architectures is best suited for a particular project, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. Every application has different requirements and goals, and the architecture should be designed accordingly. That said, understanding the characteristics of each architecture can help narrow down the decision. Layered, event-driven, message queue/broker, and microservices architectures are some of the most common design patterns. Each can provide a great foundation for system scalability and maintainability.

Which Architecture Is Right For My Project?

When deciding on an architecture for a project, it’s important to understand the requirements and goals of the application. It’s also important to consider the complexity of the project, the resources available, and any performance requirements. Generally, simple applications might benefit from the layered architecture, while more complex applications can benefit from event-driven, message queue/broker, or microservices architectures.

What Factors Should I Consider?

When selecting an architecture for a project, there are a few key factors to consider. First, it’s important to understand the rules and regulations that govern the project. This will ensure that you’re able to make the best decision for the project. It’s also important to consider the performance requirements of the application. If there are strict performance requirements, an event-driven or microservices architecture might be the best option. Additionally, it’s important to consider the skills and experience of the developers. Different architectures require different skills and levels of experience, so it’s important to select an architecture that matches the team’s abilities.

What Are The Benefits Of Each Architecture?

Each architecture offers its own set of benefits. The layered architecture offers a clear separation of responsibilities, which makes it easier to maintain and extend. The event-driven architecture is well-suited for quickly handling a variety of input events, while the message queue/broker architecture is excellent for distributed systems where multiple services need to communicate. Finally, the microservices architecture can provide a highly scalable, resilient, and maintainable application.

What Are Some Common Challenges?

Each architecture can present its own set of challenges. The layered architecture can suffer from tight coupling between tiers, which can make it difficult to maintain or extend. The event-driven architecture can be difficult to test, and the message queue/broker architecture can be challenging to debug. Finally, the microservices architecture can be complex to coordinate, as no single service is responsible for the entire system.

Anita Johnson is an award-winning author and editor with over 15 years of experience in the fields of architecture, design, and urbanism. She has contributed articles and reviews to a variety of print and online publications on topics related to culture, art, architecture, and design from the late 19th century to the present day. Johnson's deep interest in these topics has informed both her writing and curatorial practice as she seeks to connect readers to the built environment around them.

Leave a Comment